Quantum lathe overview

Hi

I made little video about the lathe.

-JP-

Advertisements

Glass memory

http://www.upi.com/Science_News/2011/08/15/Glass-memory-can-hold-data-for-centuries/UPI-81541313453583/

Noticed the news about this glass memory. This is what future will look like. Data is stored forever on piece of glass. This could make memory cards look like floppy disks.

But usually these kind of ideas are wrong. We are probably moving to cloud services and people really don’t even carry any data storing device in the future.? Why would they if the cloud has everything?

JP

How to lead people

During my working years I have met many different management styles. What I have noticed that leading people is not done by following the progress. It’s done by leading and after that following. Most managers just follow the progress and report the progress. This is not how leaders should work.

The best management style I have noticed was by group manager that had very simple and laid back style to lead and follow the work. He kept meeting every week or two weeks. He had a task list of things to do. He distributed the unmarked task list at the beginning of each meeting. Then he asked who would do certain things that are new and distributed those tasks. Next week he would ask the status of those activities and would distribute new tasks.

This sounds simple and almost stupid, but it’s the best method I have ever witnessed. There is couple of reasons why this works so great. First of all, when tasks are distributed, people need to acknowledge the task on front of their peers. They just don’t take the task, they sort of promise to the peers that they are going to do it.

The weeks task list keeps people focused on the fact what they need to do. It could be they do it during the last evening, just to be able to say they have done it. They can miss it for one or two weeks and say they are busy, but they just cannot come continuously to the meeting and say that they haven’t done it. The peer pressure is there. Sometimes they haven’t do it all, but they have tried.

Also the method can be used without knowing the actual task for the next week. Like thesis worker case. Boss has very hard time to get grips what is the actual progress of the work and is there any progress at all. But just ask each week, what are your plans for the next week. Write it down. Next week ask was that task filled and what is the next weeks task. This method is amazing. Thesis workers are young and can be horrible at planning tasks and cannot divide big tasks to small weekly parts. But this simple question, what you going to do next week is all it takes. The thesis worked thinks suitable part of the job that is not too small so it would not sound unimportant, but not too big, so he could accomplish it in a weeks time. And he takes the task, or at least the part he is able to do. So he can say they have at least tried it.

And what is the most important, he determines the task at front of peers.

Problem with this method is that if you are the boss, you cannot attack the employees if they haven’t done the task. You need to trust that the peer pressure is enough. Don’t give any critic. Just mark it for the next week as ongoing task. Actually you should not care. Do not change the job to another worker easily, but be very accurate that the tasks are small and accomplishing is possible.

Problem with this kind of task list, is that you shouldn’t in any case say that it’s a promise list. Or that it has anything to do with peers, you should be casual with it. It’s just a small reminder list to help your memory. Don’t ever say that they promised, because they didn’t.

Of course this works best in tasks that have variable tasks that need to be distributed. It is not necessary to monotonic work. But the more new tasks there is, the better it works.

Also it’s very effortless way to keep you on track.

-JP-

Evolution, religion and God

hi

I was thinking yesterday that because religion is so widespread it must be good for the human evolution. If it would be harmful to people from surviving point of view, those believing people would have died long time ago. Now it looks like atheistic people are minority and majority of people are believers. This would suggest that religion has a evolution benefit.

How could it be beneficial? During the middle ages they used to burn non believing people on bonfires, so believing was beneficial. Crusaders killed thousands of non believers?

But Jesus and also other christian people were persecuted and still they survived?

One idea that we need to consider is that God could actually be on their side? What about different religions? I checked wikipedia and noticed that Christianity is leading, but islam is the second biggest religion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_religious_groups

Maybe Christian god is more powerful compared to Islam god? As it’s more widespread? Some say they all believe in the same god. If this is the case, maybe the God is more pleased with the Christian way of worship?

Other way to look it, is to separate religion evolution from human evolution. So religions get better over time and people are just the intermediate, the substance religion is based on.

-JP-